Whitepaper Hyperconverged vs. Converged vs. Traditional IT Infrastructure
You’ve likely heard of ‘converged’ and ‘hyperconverged’ infrastructure. The Internet is littered with comparisons between traditional IT, CI, and HCI. They all have a bias. Someone is trying to sell you something, or they are trying to defend the infrastructure choices they are most familiar with. Here at Hyperconverged.org, we have our viewpoint as well: as one might expect, we like HCI.
But we’re also honest enough with ourselves to know that HCI is a specifically shaped peg, and it won’t fit into every hole. This paper shows, with the most neutral and objective disposition possible, a normalized comparison between traditional, converged, and hyperconverged infrastructure.
As you read this quick guide, you’ll learn:
- That there is classification overlap – shades of gray – and that infrastructures can’t actually be sorted quite so neatly into these three buckets
- How all three architectures have legitimate pros and cons, and there is no one-size-fits all answer to IT
- That most organizations will see a benefit from using HCI, even if they do not use HCI for all of their IT needs